|
Examination of the Theological Views and the Method Approaches of Ibn-Ghebeh-al-Razi in the Thesis "Violation of ketab-al-Ashhad"
|
| |
|
|
|
Abstract: (6566 Views) |
| Examination of the theologian's works of Imamie, show that they used different method approaches for proving their opinions. Sometimes, these theologians relied on the nobility of text, by using news, texts (NAS) and narrative methods for proving the opinions. Sometimes they used reasoning methods based on reasoning introductions for explaining religious thoughts. In this essay in addition to the examination of the verbal views and the method approaches of Ibn-Ghebeh-al-Razi, we answer to this question: By which of approaches, he proved the theological believes of Imamie and what is the difference between his method and the former theologian's methods?
The investigated text in this essay is a thesis from Ibn-Ghebeh in the thesis called “Violation of Ketab-al-Ashhad” from Abuzeid-Alavi. The important part of this thesis proved the Imamate issue and absentee of Mohammad-Ibn-Hasan-Askari, and the other part is going to prove Imamate in the Hosseini branch of the Hazrate Ali’s offspring and tell the features of Imam.
This thesis investigates the theological views of Ibn-Ghebeh and demonstrates that he proved the Imamate point-of-view and violates the views and doubt of Zaidis by reasoning approaches, using successive and famous news and forming it in a logical approach. Ibn-Ghebeh disconnected from the rational approaches of Hesham Ibn-Hakam by narrative reasons application (reasoning process based on rational and sensuous introductions) and allied with another theologian of Imamie. |
|
| Keywords: Ibn-Ghebeh-Razi, Abuzeid-Alavi, Violation of Ketab- al-Ashhad, Method Approaches, Theologian, Zaidis, Imamie. |
|
|
Full-Text [PDF 171 kb]
[English Abstract]
(1380 Downloads)
|
review paper: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2015/02/2 | Accepted: 2015/02/2 | Published: 2015/02/2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Add your comments about this article |
|
|
|
